Biking in Kanata series: a conclusion of sorts

CIMG7211

After a month long examination of what makes me bike or not bike in Kanata I have come to a some conclusions (for now anyway). The following are the factors that negatively affect my chances of choosing to get somewhere by bike:

1. distance/time
2. weather
3. bad roads
4. lack of appropriate equipment
5. hills

The purpose of this exercise was to come up with ideas of what can be done in Kanata to improve walkability and bikeability of the neighbourhood so that more people would choose to get around in that way. My disclaimer is that I have no talent for understanding other people, especially majority of people so what works for me might not be relevant for anyone else.

Distance/time:
In Kanata the easiest way to get around is by car. There is no denying this and I don’t have an issue using the car to get places and do stuff. Roads are fast, usually not congested, there is plenty of free parking, you can dump a lot of stuff in the trunk, lock it and continue on your merry way. You don’t have to worry about the bad weather or heat or UV rays (unless you open the sun roof) etc… If you are going to bike for more than a kilometre, you need an excuse other than convenience. Most people would pick exercise or environment, for me is that I hate driving and that I want to encourage active lifestyle habits for my kids by setting a good example.

Weather:
Some people say that there is no bad weather, only bad clothing. I am nowhere near that level of zen especially in the light of the thunderstorms rolling through Kanata in the last few days. We do get nice weather though so you have to be ready to take advantage of it at the spur of the moment. Having an easily accessible bike that you can use in normal clothing really helps. We rearranged our garage so that the bike I use the most is quick to get out. It is not the perfect solution and I will probably lose my bike parking when we get the minivan (ugh!) but it is ok for now.

Bad roads:
Improving the infrastructure is key to increasing the level of cycling. There is a lot going on in Ottawa with respect to this (new lanes, etc…) but I am not sure how much of this is trickling down to Kanata. Does anyone know? I suppose I really ought to find out. I did join “Citizens for Safe Cycling” out of curiosity.

My conclusion from the last month’s experiment is that Kanata is pretty sweet biking wise in the residential interior, but as soon as you hit a major thoroughfare (March, Terry Fox, Hazeldean, Eagleson) there be monsters. Yes, some of these roads have bike lanes painted on, but that does not make them good infrastructure. Another issue is with shopping areas, particularly Centrum and the strip mall off of Carling (with Chez Cora). An exception and a honourable mention go to the Signature strip mall which looks like whoever designed it actually wanted people on foot or bicycle to shop there.

I am not really sure exactly how these problem areas can be improved. I think it is important for cyclists to be physically distant from cars or trucks rushing at 80km/h. I also think that cyclists should be able to bike as fast as they can (up to 30 or 40km/h) if they are to get anywhere from Kanata. One requirement nixes the painted bike lanes on existing rads, the other nixes multi use paths.

Equipment:
Between the two of us we own six bikes with original purchase price between $100 and $1000. The more expensive bikes have more mileage on them and are driven on almost daily basis, the cheaper bikes are taking up space in the garage and will probably be sold for change if we ever get around to it. It is a bit hard to give a good argument to someone considering bike as transportation without really being sure whether they will stick to it to take $600 or more to a specialized bike shop with staff old enough to shave (be they men or women) when there are so many nice bikes at Costco for $200.

Even with a good quality bike, bike transportation is not a given. A sweet $2000 road or mountain bike is no good for a shopping trip if you have to change into clip shoes, have no panniers and no mudguards if it starts to rain.

I was recently talking to a co-worker who has a 18 month old kid and he was wondering whether he should get a bike seat or a trailer. My answer is both, but I don’t think that it is the right option for someone who will only cycle occasionally for recreation.

(This paragraph sound very consumerist and I hate it for that, but I have had enough bad experiences with poor quality sports equipment to make me somewhat bitter. I have also struggled to use good quality equipment for uses that it was not meant for (i.e. trailers for short trips and shopping). I am trying to speak form experience and not from “look! shiny!!!” perspective.)

Hills:
I just have to live with hills.

Biking in Kanata series: the perfect bicycle

When I first moved to Kanata my mom got me a second hand bike from someone at her work. It is a Fuji mixte mountain hybridy something or other with not too bad shifting gears but overall heavy and not my size. I rode it to work and sometimes other places but not exclusively and not, what I would call, a lot. This was at the time before I got my drivers licence and before Chris lived in Kanata and was able to drive me around at the drop of the hat so it was the perfect time for utilitarian biking, but I did not really do much of it. I was a little bit perplexed by that. Yes, Kanata infrastructure could use some bike-friending, but some can be said for Zagreb where I run errands on bike all summer. I attributed this to general boringness of Kanata and the the fact that I was wearing a helmet. I have nothing against helmets, I wear them on any ride I consider dangerous (March road anyone?), but that does not make me like them. In retrospect, the bike had a lot to do with it as well. It was the perfect bike at the time because it was there and it was free at the time when I had just started making money, but not the perfect bike for me. I still have that bike. The money I would get for it if I tried to sell it does not justify the effort and sometimes I ride it in the winter.

CIMG5642
Biking in Zagreb – look ma, no infrastructure!

A few years later Chris and I got matching Rocky Mountain hybrids and our recreational and commuting cycling really took off. We routinely biked downtown or through the rural areas on weekends. These were the perfect DINKy bikes. We did not do any utilitarian cycling. The effort or tying up those bikes is unreasonably high. The bikes have quick release parts which make them transportable by car but you have to make a pretzel with a bike chain to secure everything. There is no appreciable cargo space. Riding these bikes in normal clothes is uncomfortable, indecent even in case of skirts (crossbar) and you’re bound to get chain grease on the legs. The bike handles poorly when it has to stop and start often (it likes to go fast for a long time) and the addition of the trailer made all of these problems more acute.

Cycling etc 035
DINKy days

With kids my time and willingness to put in effort decreased and recreational and fitness cycling is just not something that I do very often. This is where Kona Africa comes in. It can carry kids close enough to me to be able to have a conversation with them, it handles well when stoping and starting often. I can cycle in regular clothes but there is still no room for groceries (as long as the kids seats are on the bike anyway). I am pretty sure I doubled (at least) the amount of utilitarian cycling I do just by using this bike. It is the perfect bike for now, but it is not the perfect bike. I’d really like something zippier that fits my geometry better.

This summer I am already starting to be a bit too big and wimpy with the pregnancy to bike longer distances (summers are uncomfortably hot when you are pregnant). Even short trips to the grocery store take twice as long with the bike and Chris is unlikely to be interested in joining us after doing his 40k commute. Next year, I might not be able to bike much because the baby will be too young. I will try and bike with the older two when I get a chance (how often will that be?). The year after that we will have to rethink our whole strategy. Will we get a trail-a-bike for Trev for recreational rides? Will we still do any recreational rides? Should I get a bike with extended rear rack so I can fit all three kids on a utilitarian bike? Would I even be able to pull a bike with three kids on it? Would I want to?

IMG_1957

Some days I feel like utilitarian biking is just a pipe dream for this family… How to get out of this funk? I love biking, I love biking with kids, infrastructure in Kanata is not as bad as that, there are places to go to within 20 minutes, I hate driving the car etc, etc, etc. So what is it going to take to bike more?

Biking in Kanata series: All dressed up, but where to go?

About two weeks ago I got a bike computer installed on my utility bike and decided to keep stats of some of my trips. I made a list of places in Kanata that are within biking range and that I frequent on regular or semi regular basis. I wanted to determine what factors made it a good or bad destination for cycling.

Since I installed the bike computer I clocked just over 60 km.

Closest places are the library and daycare centre. These are the places that I will bike to by default and only take the car if the weather is bad or for some other very good reason (scheduling issue or a trip in which this is just one of the stops). Even if I am driving to work, I will bike Trev to daycare and then bike back with Owen and get into the car. The round trip lasts less than 5 minutes and it saves me the trouble of driving to the daycare and parking in the daycare parking lot which always makes me uncomfortable. Both locations are under a kilometre away from my home, and the routes to get there are as low in traffic as residential Kanata gets.

Next closest places are the grocery stores, Metro at 2km (10 min) away and Farm Boy at 3.5 km (15 min). The time it takes to get to both stores is twice as it would take me in the car. Over last two weeks the number of trips I’ve made by bike was about the same as by car. Even though it is closer, I prefer biking to Farm Boy than to Metro because of the three hills I have to climb on the way back from Metro with groceries. One of this hills (between Metro and March road) contains moderate traffic which I would prefer to avoid. In fact, before I got the bike computer I very rarely shopped at Farm Boy, but after this experiment I will always consider it first if I am about to go shopping on the bike. Another interesting thing I learned last week is that I prefer biking to Farm Boy on roads than on paths. The paths contain a number of hills which are probably not an issue on most bikes, but on my heavy bike with kids and groceries it can be a bit grating. The residential feeder roads to get there are wide, have sufficient bike infrastructure, traffic calming measures and I feel very safe on them.

The problem with groceries is that my bike is not set up to carry anything other than children and one medium sized bag. If I leave Owen at home I can fit one grocery bag in his seat and I might be able to fit one overfilled grocery bag in Trev’s seat, but I have not yet gone to the grocery store without him. Once the kids are old enough not to be riding on my bike, I will probably install panniers and/or a crate but that is too far in the future to seriously think about. Currently, space is limited and I do not have the umph to pull children AND more than two bags of groceries on the bike.

The next location is the Centrum. I timed my trip to the hair salon near the movie theatre, but I think that the timing is close enough for all areas of the “mall”. This distance is 4 km and it took me just under 20 minutes. I have not timed the equivalent trip by car, but I think it would take half the time. Getting to the edge of Centrum is a breeze, but I do not feel entirely comfortable getting into the area and biking “inside” it. Ironically enough, it is probably easier to bike than to walk there. Fortunately for me, no stores that I frequent on the regular basis are inside the bird’s nest so I can handle the occasional trip by bike if need be.

I’ve already talked about biking to work, but over the last two weeks, I’ve made some readjustments in my opinion on it. I found out that, while biking to work in the morning takes 20 minutes longer than by car, biking back takes the same time or no more than 5 minutes longer. This is due to afternoon congestion on March road going towards Eagleson. I’ve also found this trip is near the comfort limits of trips on this particular bicycle. The distance, the hills in Morgan’s Grant, the extra weight I am carrying in internal and external children and the general clunkiness of the bike makes it unlikely for me to be willing to make the trip two days in the row. My legs are slightly sore and I feel bad for Trev having to stay at daycare for 20 minutes longer than if I drove, which I am sure he doesn’t mind half as much as I do.

There are three more locations on my list that I have not biked to, and might never actually get around to biking to but as they are within easy biking distance I feel I need to consider them.

Costco is one of the places I don’t see myself biking to. Getting to the corner of Terry Fox and Katimavik should be no problem, but I would be reluctant to go from there to Costco due to high traffic. It would be even harder to get back as I would have to navigate the same traffic up the hill with groceries. Whenever I go there I get at least 20 kilos of groceries which is equivalent of the two of my children plus two bags of groceries. It should be doable once I am not pregnant, but I would have to go without the kids which I would prefer not to do because I like to spend as much time with them as possible.

Hazeldean road has a number of stores that I visit semi frequently. Despite it being relatively far, getting to Hazledean should be no problem (except that it would take over 20 minutes, probably closer to half an hour) but Hazledean itself is a busy road with little or no bicycle infrastructure. I would not go there unless I am really in a mood for a long bike ride.

The last destination in the Riverglen Farm on Carling. The way there is quite safe, mostly on paths and wide paved shoulders though it is far (just under 6 km). It would be a fun ride with kids though so the distance is justifiable. However, currently our veggie pick up is on night that I have other commitments so I do not have an hour to spend on a round trip bike ride. My schedule should change soonish so I just might consider this a fun family weeknight activity.

Biking in Kanata series: maps

Here are a few section of biking maps depicting North Kanata

OldKanatBikeMap
From MapArt Ontario paper map published in 1999

This map is pretty decent given that very large part of the Kanata we know today did not exist at the time of printing. There are parts of the bike infrastructure missing even though they existed long before the map was made. For example, a path through Beaverbrook Park connecting Parkway and Campeau adjacent to Oakes Wood is missing.

MapGuideLiteView
This is a section of on-line City of Ottawa on-line map published in 2006

The online version of this map is difficult to navigate. There is an “emap” version, but it requires an install. I don’t remember if I ever installed it, but if I did I don’t remember being impressed. Again, despite Beaverbrook now changing for at least a decade if not four, this map shows different paths than the above one. The path between Parkway and Campeau is present (yay!) but the paths on Leacock and Parkway surrounding Alice Woods (name not on the map) are incorrectly drawn. Also, the paths next to the Stephen Leacock elementary school are missing as are others, notably the link between Beaverbrook and Kanata Lakes (Leacock to Knudson by Tiffany Crescent). This map, besides being on-line and free, is definitely inferior to the printed version.

KanataBikePlanMap
Map from the Ottawa Cycling Plan document published in 2008

As is expected from a decent planning document, this has all the paths I can think of, even the little paths surrounding public buildings like the library, high school and daycare. An interesting omission on this map is the link between Beaverbrook and Kanata Lakes present on the on-line city map. I believe this link is owned by the City but the golf course people paint “Private” on it every year and every year it gets painted over in black paint (by the City or a citizen, I don’t know). Another thing noticeable about this map is that it has Castlefrank south of the highway marked as a “shared route” which I have never heard of before but I suppose it means that the road is extra vide to allow for cyclists, even though there are no painted lanes. I like this because Castlefrank is a good connection to get to Hazeldean from the highway overpass.

In any case, this map is the most complete map despite not being intended for “tourist” use.

2011KanataMap
Recently published (privately?) Capital region cycling map. It is not advertised from the city website, but there is City logo on the map itself as well as NCC, Gatineau and Bixi logos

I like the look and feel of this map even though it sacrifices street names of all but the major thoroughfares for the tidy look. I love the suggested routes in dotted red. In content, this map has more paths than the 2006 on-line map, but also carries mistakes present in that version (messed up path north of Parkway). There are also discrepancies with the planning document map, notably in the Village Green (south of Campeau) area, though they might be due to area being built up since 2008. Minor paths, such as ones leading to the library, high school and daycare are missing, but that might be by choice. It is interesting that the section of Castlefrank, marked on the City planning map as shared use, is not marked on this map at all, not even as a suggested route even though this would be my choice trajectory to get to Hazeldean.

Overall, this map is a definite improvement over the 2006 version but I wish that they had used the city planning map rather than whatever they used to determine where the paths are. Suggested routes are a step in the right direction, but you have keep in mind that they are someone else’s choice and might not reflect your own preferences.

google_map_beaverbrook
Screen capture of Google Maps with cycling directions

Then there is the Google, because, frankly, that is the map that I, if not most people, am most likely to use. It is in Beta version which explains the bizarre choices of which paths are marked. There are at least a couple of paths noted here that are not in any other maps. These paths exist in real life but I am guessing they are too recent for the other maps. I’ve submitted a request to add the path next to Beaverbrook Park to the map so I am waiting to see if there will be any reply. I suspect that this map will be much better once it is out of Beta. Until then, meh!

Biking in Kanata series: kids as cargo

CIMG7118

A bike with kid carrying capabilities in Kanata is, in my opinion, not a one less minivan. I see a lot of trailers and third wheels, even tandem third wheels are not unusual, on Kanata roads and paths. If you walk down any residential street on a weekend, you will see open garages with fleets of bicycles inside. Around elementary and high school bike racks are always filled during school hours. It is a common sight for elementary school kids to bike (usually on sidewalks) unaccompanied by adults.

On the other hand, I have never seen a cargo bike in Kanata. I have only seen one cargo bike in Ottawa that was obviously intended for child transport. I saw it on Bank street next to Lansdowne. As a Kanata family that tries to bike as much as possible, I choose to run most of my errands by car. While it is not impossible for a Kanata family (parents with children) to cut down to one car and a fleet of bicycles, including utilitarian bicycles such as cargo bikes, I have this preconception that it would take significant sacrifices in terms of convenience and comfort. I wonder if anyone has done it and what their experience was. Frankly, I could not stand living in Kanata without my own dedicated car even before we had children, though many of my dinky friends seem to do well with sharing a single car between a couple.

Note, in this post I refer to cargo bikes as bikes with a box to carry children and groceries in. I have actually seen about half a dozen of the other kind of child cargo bike (the bike with extended back rack) this weekend on the night ride. Most of the ones I have noticed seemed to be sold at Tall Tree Cycles (though Kunstadt employee assured me that they sell Xtracycle parts). These include Kona Ute and Surly Big Dummy as well as regular bikes with Xtracycle attachment. I’ve spoken to the lady riding the Kona Ute and she was very happy with it. She lives in Ottawa neighbourhood closeish to downtown and carries a 5 and a 7 year old on the back. I did not ask her if having a child carrying bike allows her to get rid of the second family car though her neighbourhood, being somewhat older, is probably a lot less car centric than Kanata.

On re-reading this post I noticed that I have completely dismissed trailers and third wheels as utilitarian child transport, even though they are adequate for the task. In fact, the other kid in Trev’s daycare that gets biked to school arrives by trailer and, more recently, by a tandem third wheel. However, same as Trevor, he is mostly dropped off by car. We own and use a trailer, and it is not unlikely that we will get a third wheel at some point. These are fantastic products but are optimal for long distance and recreational riding. Trailers are really difficult to back up, a hassle to lock to a bike rack and require fair amount of athletic riding to pull. Any time I biked to work with the trailer I needed a shower. In my experience a trailer is not a good solution for utilitarian trips under 10km.

Edit: Yes, I know of a number of Kanata families, including families with up to three children, that only have one car. However, I do not know any family that handles the lack of second car by the whole, or most, of the family cycling.

Biking in Kanata series: biking to work

Over the decade I have been living in Kanata, I have biked to work at least several times each summer. In fact, biking to work is the single most “successful” aspect of my utilitarian Kanata biking, possibly the only consistent utilitarian biking. I have biked on three different bicycles, from three different homes (two in Beaverbrook, one in Morgan’s Grant) to two different work locations (the main building and the factory) over four significantly different paths. I have also biked to Carleton from Beaverbrook for two seasons. Here are some thoughts:

Weather:
I am a fair weather cyclist. I don’t bike if it is too hot or too cold.

Routes:
The fastest routes tend to be the ones with most car traffic and most lacking in helpful bicycle infrastructure. Existence of a bike lane on the road does not make a route appropriate for all cyclists. When I started cycling in Kanata and now that I carry children on the bike, I do not go on the March road for more than one block. I will bike on March road when I am alone, but the disappearing bike lanes at intersections, “bike pockets” and trucks zipping past at 80km/h creep me out. March road is definitely not a family route.

Alternative to the March road is a multi use path (MUP) through the forest. It is longer and slower but much more pleasant. There are a good number of commuters on the path which makes it even more pleasant. However, the path is currently closed as a part of the forest is being cut down to build houses. The city or the builder very kindly did not make alternate arrangements for people to get through. Apparently a good number of commuters still use this path despite fence and no trespassing signs. If I am going to trespass, I’d rather do it on flat and paved so I am currently using a section of private road parallel to March road to get to work.

Showers:
Showers take time and require extra luggage (towel, shampoo, flip-flops, hairbrush) on the bike. When I was booting it to Carleton (20+ km), taking a nice refreshing shower was great. As no one was paying me for my time, it was not an issue, however, taking shower at work, particularly after only 8km biked, was a hassle and a waste of time. Ideally, if I am biking less than 10km, which is the case with my work, I would prefer to be able to bike leisurely without requiring any clothes change whatsoever, not even shoes if I can help it.

The future:
I see myself continuing to bike to work on most summer days, given the weather is not too crazy. This will be more likely once all the kids are in school/daycare in Beaverbrook three years from now. I will also have to do something about the speed of my commuter bike in order to keep my leisurely trip within 10 minutes or less it would take me with the car. I can’t justify more than 20 minutes per day of extra commuting time.

The infrastructure:
March road is fine for aggressive and experienced cyclists. I would feel more comfortable if the bike lane did not disappear when you needed it most, but I am not holding my breath for this to change. I would like to see a MUP parallel to the road, there is plenty of space on the south side of the street. I don’t know when the forest path will be open again and in what shape it will be, given the housing development, but in the absence of a MUP next to the March road, it is not a bad alternative.